Legal Intuition Is Not a Clinical Assessment

You are not qualified to decide if a medical malpractice case has merit.

Neither is anyone else, without reviewing the chart.

The difference is that a trained clinician can close that gap once the records are in front of them. Legal training does not close it.

The Most Expensive Person in the Ecosystem

The attorney who has been practicing plaintiff med mal for twenty years and believes their intake instinct is a clinical assessment is the most expensive person in this entire ecosystem. Not because they are wrong all the time. Because they are wrong often enough to cost their practice tens of thousands of dollars a year in unrecoverable expert fees, and they have enough wins to never fully confront the number.

What Legal Intuition Actually Is

Legal intuition built on years of case experience is real and it has value. It is pattern recognition developed through legal work. It is not a standard of care analysis. It has never been a standard of care analysis.

The standard of care analysis asks: given this presentation, at this moment, with this documentation, what did the applicable clinical standard require? That question requires someone who has made those decisions in real time under the same conditions.

The gap between legal intuition and that analysis is exactly where most of the money gets lost in plaintiff med mal intake.

caseveritas.com