Pre-Litigation Clinical Screening for Solo and Small Firm Plaintiff Attorneys

Large plaintiff firms have in-house nurses on staff. Some have physician relationships they call before a retain decision is made. They have infrastructure that filters cases before money goes out the door.

Solo attorneys and small firms do not have that.

The Reality of Small Firm Intake

They are reading records themselves at 10pm. They are calling a doctor friend who does them a favor but is not doing a formal review. They are making retain decisions based on their own clinical interpretation of records they were not trained to read, under time pressure, on contingency.

That is not a criticism. It is the structural reality of doing this work without institutional support. The large firm advantage in med mal intake is not legal skill. It is clinical infrastructure. And that infrastructure is not available per-case to the solo practitioner.

What Case Veritas Provides for That Gap

Case Veritas exists specifically for this situation. Dual physician and nurse review. All specialties. $1,000 flat. Five business days. The same clinical infrastructure the large firms have built internally, available per case, without the overhead.

For the solo practitioner who handles a few potential med mal cases a month and cannot afford to get one wrong. For the two-attorney firm that does mixed plaintiff work and does not have dedicated med mal infrastructure. For the attorney who is good at this work and wants to get better without hiring a full-time nurse consultant.

If that describes your practice, we built this for you. caseveritas.com.